Full article

Law Firm Compensation: The Ultimate Guide to Retaining Talent

The compensation of lawyers and partners is no minor issue: it defines the firm’s culture and shapes its growth. A poor system creates internal conflicts and talent drain; a good model ensures collaboration, sustainability, and motivation.
For lawyers who want to set up their first firm, it is key to understand the three layers that coexist in the economic structure of any law firm:

FIRST: Salaried lawyers (non-partners), including juniors, associates, and seniors, earn a fixed salary and sometimes a bonus tied to billable hours or performance, but they do not share in profits.

SECOND: Non-equity partners (income partners) have a higher fixed salary plus a variable element based on results. They do not share profits nor assume business risk, but they hold partner status.

THIRD: Equity partners are the true “owners.” After deducting salaries and firm expenses, they share the profit among themselves according to the chosen system.

Three Common Partner Compensation Models

Model A. Simple Hybrid by Pools (ideal for small firms, up to 15 partners)

30% → Pool of the practice/section that worked on the matter, distributed among partners of that area according to criteria: who executed, who led, who generated cross-selling.

25% → General expenses (overheads).

15% → Origination pool (for whoever brought the client or the matter).

30% → Net profit, distributed among equity partners according to their participation.

Advantage: very easy to implement and transparent, though it may fall short as the firm grows.

Model B. Points System (for medium firms, 10–40 partners)

Each partner has fixed points (by category: junior, senior, director) and variable points (based on actual contribution).

Case study (15 partners, €1.5M profit):

60% (€900,000) distributed fixed by category.

40% (€600,000) distributed variable as follows:

20% for client origination (who brings business).

10% for matter execution (hours, quality, leadership).

10% for internal management (team, innovation, ESG).

Example:

Partner A (senior): brought 10% of revenue and executed 8% of hours → earns €117,000 in total (fixed + variable).

Partner C (director): brought 20% of revenue and executed 10% of hours → earns €162,500.

Advantage: balances fairness and merit, but requires a compensation committee and clear rules to avoid disputes.

Model C. Modified Lockstep with “Gateways” (for large firms, 40+ partners)

Partners progress through participation bands. Each band corresponds to a % of profit.

Case study (10 partners, €2M profit):

Band 1: 2% → €40,000

Band 3: 6% → €120,000

Band 4: 8% → €160,000

Band 5: 10% → €200,000

A new partner enters with 2%. If they meet objectives (bringing clients, leading teams, contributing business), they can move up every few years to 10%.

Advantage: provides stability and firm culture. Drawback: less attractive for major “rainmakers” who want immediate credit for what they generate.

Which Model to Choose to Start?

Small firm (2–10 partners): Model A (pools). Simple, transparent, quick to apply.

Medium firm (10–40 partners): Model B (points). Flexible, recognizes multiple contributions.

Large firm (40+ partners): Model C (modified lockstep). Preserves cohesion, while adding incentives for individual merit.

Keys for Any System to Work

§  Transparency: all partners must know the rules.

§  Flexibility: review the model every 1–2 years; what works with 5 partners won’t work with 30.

§  Clear metrics: define what “bringing a client” or “executing a matter” means to avoid disputes.

§  Governance: create a compensation committee with rotation, minutes, and objective criteria.

§  Strict separation: first pay salaries and expenses; only then distribute profit among equity partners.

Conclusion

There is no single perfect system: each firm must choose the one that best fits its culture and size. The key is to understand that compensation is not just money, it is strategy: it defines whether the firm will be competitive, collaborative, and sustainable over time.