Full article

Tennis controversy: Jannik Sinner escapes doping ban, sparks criticism of ATP

World tennis has been shaken by a scandal that calls into question the credibility of the bodies responsible for ensuring the integrity of the sport. The protagonist of this drama is Jannik Sinner, the number one in the world ranking, who has been involved in a controversial doping case. What began as a simple routine test at the Indian Wells tournament in March has unleashed a storm that threatens to change the perception of justice on the tennis circuit.

In March 2024, during the prestigious Indian Wells tournament, Sinner was subjected to an anti-doping control, as is customary in these events. To everyone's surprise, the result was positive, which resulted in the cancellation of the points obtained and the withdrawal of the prize money. However, what seemed to be a closed case took an unexpected turn when the International Tennis Integrity Agency (ITIA) declared the Italian's innocence four months later, arguing that everything was the result of a mistake by the player's physiotherapist. According to the ITIA, the specialist used a product containing clostebol, a banned substance, and passed it on to the player by not wearing gloves during the treatment.

This resolution has left no one indifferent. The first to raise his voice was Nick Kyrgios, known for his outspokenness and rebellious attitude on and off the court. The Australian did not hesitate to describe as “ridiculous” the decision not to sanction Sinner, arguing that a positive result should undoubtedly entail a two-year suspension. But Kyrgios is not alone in his outrage. Denis Shapovalov was also critical, expressing concern about the disparity in the application of the rules: “Different players, different rules,” he said, implying that not all tennis players are treated equally when faced with similar cases.

The controversy doesn't stop there. The decision to acquit Sinner, but at the same time uphold the sanction that strips him of points and the Indian Wells prize money, has generated a flurry of commentary and criticism. Fernando M. Carreño, journalist of Marca, recalled the case of Nicolás Jarry, who was suspended for 11 months after consuming a contaminated vitamin supplement. This precedent calls into question the consistency of ITIA decisions.

The situation is further complicated by accusations of possible bias within the Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP), where several of the top officials are Italian. Tomás Carbonell, former tennis player and now commentator, was quick to put his finger on the sore spot: “This is horrible news for tennis. Sinner has been fortunate to have compatriots at the helm of the ATP. Who has a friend, has a treasure,” he commented with irony, suggesting that the fact that the Italians control the ATP may have influenced the decision.

From the Professional Tennis Players Association (PTPA), there have also been reactions. Ahmad Nassar, one of its leaders, emphasized the need for a transparent and consistent sanctioning system for all players, regardless of their ranking, gender or nationality. These statements were supported by Vasek Pospisil, who expressed his agreement with a resounding “bingo”, and by Portugal's Gaston Elias, who did not bite his tongue by declaring that “tennis is officially a joke”.

The ATP, for its part, also issued a statement expressing its satisfaction with Sinner's acquittal, noting that “we are pleased that no fault or negligence was found on the part of Jannik Sinner.” This stance has been seen by many as an attempt by the ATP to protect one of its brightest stars, but has also fueled suspicions of preferential treatment towards the Italian.

Sinner's case has left a bittersweet feeling in the tennis world. Although the ITIA has determined that the clostebol entered his system accidentally, many wonder whether justice has been applied fairly. This episode has not only jeopardized the reputation of one of the most promising tennis players on the circuit, but has also opened a debate about transparency and equality in the treatment of players, a debate that will undoubtedly continue in the coming months.