These methods promote fairness and equity in sport and preserve relationships and foster a more harmonious environment.

Full article

Sports Dispute Resolution: Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanisms

In sports, disputes are inevitable. From contractual disagreements between athletes and clubs, to disputes over arbitration decisions or rule violations, conflicts are an integral part of the sports landscape. However, the resolution of these disputes does not always have to go through the traditional courts. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms, such as arbitration and mediation, offer effective and specialized solutions for the sporting community. This article explores these mechanisms from a legal perspective, highlighting their relevance and benefits in the international context.

Sports arbitration

Arbitration is one of the most widely used ADR mechanisms in the sporting arena. This process involves the resolution of disputes by one or more independent arbitrators specialized in sports law, whose decisions are binding on the parties involved.

Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS/CAS)

The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS/CAS), based in Lausanne, Switzerland, is the most internationally recognized institution for the resolution of sports disputes through arbitration. Founded in 1984, CAS/CAS acts as the "supreme court" of sport, resolving cases ranging from appeals against decisions of sports federations to contractual disputes and doping issues.

Procedure

The arbitration procedure at CAS/CAS is structured and efficient. The parties present their arguments and evidence before a panel of arbitrators, who issue an arbitral award that is final and enforceable in any country that is a party to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards.

Advantages of arbitration

• Specialization: arbitrators are experts in sports law, which ensures well-informed decisions.
• Speed: arbitration is generally faster than traditional court proceedings.
• Confidentiality: unlike public trials, arbitration can be confidential, protecting the reputation of the parties involved.
• Flexibility: the parties may agree on the procedures and rules governing the arbitration, adapting it to their specific needs.

Sports mediation

Mediation is another effective ADR mechanism for resolving sports disputes. Unlike arbitration, mediation does not result in a binding decision imposed by a third party. Instead, a neutral mediator helps the parties negotiate and reach a mutually acceptable agreement.

In the mediation process, the mediator facilitates communication between the parties, identifies underlying interests and explores possible solutions. Mediation may be voluntary or required by a contract or sports rules.

Advantages of mediation

• Control of the parties: the parties maintain control over the outcome, which can lead to more creative and satisfactory solutions.
• Preservation of relationships: the collaborative nature of mediation can help preserve personal and professional relationships.
• Economy: mediation is often less expensive than arbitration or court litigation.
• Confidentiality: similar to arbitration, mediation is confidential, which protects the privacy of the parties.

Legal and Practical Considerations

1. ADR clauses in sports contracts

To take advantage of the benefits of arbitration and mediation, it is essential to include ADR clauses in sports contracts. These clauses should specify the type of ADR mechanism to be used, the administering institution (such as CAS/CAS), and the applicable procedures. Including well-drafted ADR clauses in sponsorship contracts, employment contracts, and transfer agreements can prevent lengthy and costly legal disputes.

2. Recognition and enforcement of arbitration awards and mediation agreements

The recognition and enforcement of sports arbitration awards are supported by the New York Convention, to which more than 160 countries adhere. This ensures that CAS/CAS awards are enforceable internationally. As for mediation agreements, their binding force can be enhanced by converting them into settlement contracts that are recognized by the courts.

Conclusion

Alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, such as arbitration and mediation, offer efficient, specialized and confidential solutions for the resolution of sports disputes. These methods not only promote fairness and equity in sport, but also preserve relationships and foster a more harmonious environment. For the legal and sporting community, understanding and employing these mechanisms is critical to effectively manage conflicts and ensure the sustainable development of sport globally.