An analysis of the different models and their impact on management

Full article

Governance and legal structure of sport organisations

In the dynamic world of sport, the governance and legal structure of sport organisations are crucial elements in ensuring their long-term success and sustainability. As these organisations face increasing challenges both financially and ethically, the way they are led and managed is of fundamental importance. This article provides a detailed analysis of different governance models and their impact on the management of these entities, from traditional assemblies to modern boards of directors.

Governance models in sports organisations

General Assembly

The General Assembly is the supreme body in many sports organisations, especially in clubs and federations. Usually composed of the partners or members, this structure allows for broad participation in decision-making. General assemblies usually have competencies in key areas such as the approval of budgets, election of the board of directors and modification of statutes.

The main advantage of this model lies in its democratic and representative nature, which promotes greater transparency and legitimacy in decision-making. However, the disadvantage can be the slowness of decision-making due to the large number of participants and the need to reach broad consensus.

Board of Directors

The Board of Directors is another common model, composed of a smaller group of individuals elected to make strategic decisions and oversee the day-to-day management of the organisation. This model allows for greater agility and efficiency in decision-making, as meetings are smaller and often more specialised.

A strength of boards of directors is their ability to react quickly to change and make informed decisions based on specialised knowledge. However, a potential drawback is the concentration of power in the hands of a few, which can reduce transparency and increase the risk of conflicts of interest.

Hybrid structures

In some cases, sports organisations adopt hybrid structures that combine elements of both models. For example, they may have a general assembly that meets annually to decide on key issues, while a smaller board of directors is responsible for day-to-day management.

This approach attempts to balance representativeness and efficiency, allowing important strategic decisions to be made in an inclusive manner, while day-to-day operations are managed in a more agile and expert manner.

Management impact

Transparency and accountability

The governance structure of a sports organisation significantly influences its level of transparency and accountability. General assemblies tend to foster greater transparency due to their open and democratic nature. Members can demand accountability and directly monitor the decisions of the board of directors.

On the other hand, boards of directors, being composed of a small number of members, may offer fewer opportunities for external oversight. However, this can be mitigated by implementing transparency policies, such as regular publication of financial reports and minutes of meetings.

Operational efficiency

Operational efficiency is another crucial aspect affected by governance. Boards are often more efficient in decision-making and policy implementation, thanks to their small size and specialised focus. However, this efficiency must be balanced with control mechanisms to avoid abuses of power.

General assemblies, although less efficient in terms of speed of decision-making, can ensure that important decisions are taken in an inclusive and democratic manner, which can strengthen support and cohesion within the organisation.

Adaptability and sustainability

The ability to adapt to change and remain sustainable in the long term is also influenced by the governance structure. Organisations with well-trained and specialised boards can adapt more quickly to changes in the sport environment, such as new regulations or market trends. However, they must maintain a balance with member involvement to ensure that decisions are aligned with the interests and values of the membership base. 

Conclusion

In short, there is no single governance model that is ideal for all sports organisations. The choice between a general assembly, a board of directors or a hybrid structure depends on a number of factors, including the size of the organisation, its culture, and the specific objectives it pursues. What is essential is that each organisation carefully assesses its needs and establishes a governance structure that promotes transparency, efficiency and adaptability, thus ensuring its long-term success and sustainability.